My dad reads this blog every day. He says he sits down and gets his fix – a mixture of laughing or crying or sometimes a little of both — depending on the post, depending on the day. Tonight as I post tomorrow’s message a little early, I’m worried that my dad is going to shudder and might close his laptop lid and walk away. I believe we may have differing viewpoints and beliefs about this topic. I’m almost guaranteed that my mom and I don’t agree on it, but I could be wrong. If I get a phone call from my mother-in-law, I’m sure I’ll know her viewpoint soon as well.
The topic: embryonic stem cell research.
I was born and raised a Catholic. So was my husband. I went through 12 years of Catholic schooling and earned my initial graduate degree from a Catholic University. Once my husband’s annulment was approved, we took great pains to have our marriage blessed by the Catholic Church after being married across the street in a lovely, Lutheran congregation. Yes, we did that more for our parents, but it was important to them, so it was important to us. While I am officially on record as a Catholic, it’s been years since I religiously (pun intended) practiced in a formal building with a steeple. I visit them sometimes and I stop and pray. Most recently, I lit a candle and said a prayer at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City.
If we need labels, I consider myself a Christian. I do my best to live a good, honest, and moral life. Yes, I’ve made some mistakes along the way (no one needs to email me to remind me of them). I try to correct and learn from those mistakes and live a Christian life. I believe in God and His Son, Jesus Christ. I frankly don’t care if Jesus was a just a carpenter or just a miracle worker. Some say He was married and bore a child. I don’t care about that either. He was God’s Son and being married or a father, in my eyes, makes Him no less holy than He was. And, at least if He was married, He had good taste. He was reportedly married to a redhead.
I’m greatly conflicted about the religious beliefs and practices of most formal religious groups. I refuse to stand in a Church, be a hypocrite and profess my faith while not being in agreement with the philosophies behind the religious congregation. I don’t feel like I need a title, a label, a building, rules or regulations to love God. I am faithful and I have faith. I practice both more privately. And, yes, I still seek to find the truth in what I really believe. I hope, genuinely hope, I find that truth someday. I would love to truly fit into a congregation that I could call family; into a building I could call my religious home. I’m just not there yet.
I’m also normally very private about my political beliefs. I work for public broadcasting and choose to avoid public discussions that would make someone question my ability to support the non-partisan mission of that entity. My religious beliefs, or conflicting confusions about them, don’t play a role in my political beliefs. And here is where the controversy begins. I have my opinions on abortion rights, gay marriage, and on the death penalty. I also have very strong opinions on immigration reform, campaign spending, and our ever-declining economy. I’m sickened by war. While I consider my religious upbringing in my choices about those issues, I don’t make my choices because of any one religion. For those who are highly devout, I understand this just doesn’t make any sense to you. It’s just how I personally operate.
I think it’s important to state up front that I have supported stem cell research for many years, as far back as it came into the scientific community as a potential for curing many, many life-altering and life-threatening diseases. I’m not a band Wagoner – one of those people who get struck down with a non-curable disease and then all of a sudden believe in the cause. I believed before I became sick with the MonSter. Naturally, I believe even more strongly about it now. So, how do I rationalize using human embryos – what many consider as human life and therefore entitled to protection – in medical research?
Yes, of course, I have a stance on when “life” truly begins. I understand the ethical and moral fine lines surrounding the controversy. But, I also know that 400,000 Americans and more than two million people in the world suffer from the MonSter. Millions and millions suffer and die from other non-curable diseases every single day. These are living, breathing, contributing members of our society. They are parents, children, friends, neighbors, co-workers. They are adults who protect living and breathing children from harm and danger. They teach our children and help them grow into becoming other contributing members of society. Many of them are crying, breathing, crawling, and walking children themselves. They are already alive, already born, and already physically on this earth. They are suffering and they are dying. And, there is something that can help.
Cloning freaks me out and I don’t support it. There’s a line and it shouldn’t be crossed. Creating embryos just for the sole purpose of donating them to science doesn’t sit well with me either. However, I support the idea that when a woman, through the process of in vitro fertilization, is left with viable excess embryos, she should have the choice to donate her embryos for scientific research. Or they can just be discarded or live in a freezer.
And, I believe with my whole heart, that MY Federal Government should fund that research.
I understand that this is a slippery slope and that human life should be cherished. I just want my Federal Government to cherish my life as much as the one that is in the freezer or the test tube or can’t be seen unless under a microscope. When did we abandon the living, breathing, producing adults and their children to protect those who have yet to truly be born?
I haven’t made a firm and educated choice of who will receive my vote next year. But I can assure you that man or woman must believe in supporting stem cell research and put their money where their mouth is.
Click here for information on the candidates and stem cell research.

Kim,
Are you aware of the differences between adult stem cell research (which no one has ethical objections to) and embryonic stem cell research?
Did you know that adult stem cell research has been far more promising than embryonic stem cell research so far?
And are you aware that it is now possible to produce the equivalent of embryonic stemstem cells by reprogramming human skin cells, and without using embryos? Here is a recent column about that (I hope I can make the link work):
Charles Krauthammer on Stem Cells
This information is very new (the news came out the week after Thanksgiving), so the position of the National MS Society is now out of date. There is now virtually no potential benefit to embryonic stem cell research, and research will most likely be focused on non-embryo-destroying forms of research, simply because it is more promising.
The issue, as I understand it, is that the federal government is refusing to provide federal money for embryonic stem cell research. In no way are researchers prevented from conducting such research–it’s just that the government isn’t going to fund it. Now, if it is truly promising research, people should be lining up in droves to fund it–like the way people donate to cancer and heart disease research.
An entirely valid argument, that brings ethics off the table, is to say that any promise such research has is just that–promise. The government could rationally decide that such promise isn’t worth the barrels of cash, seeing as other forms seem at least if not more viable. That people continue to demand the government foot the bill might just mean that no private investor thinks it has that much promise either.
Thanks for your comment here! One thing I am is open-minded and trust me, I’d love a solution that doesn’t require any sort of confrontation or controversy (smile). I have been reading about adult stem cell research, particularly as it relates to M.S., and it does seem promising. I guess, though, I am of the mindset of some researchers in that I don’t want promising research with adult cells to replace the opportunity for equally aggressive research with embryonic cells. Especially if both can provide viable solutions.
While the M.S. Society’s position paper pre-dates this new discovery, the Society believes in “pursuing all promising stem cell research” and has published concerns about the effectiveness of adult stem cells as they relate to M.S. Here is a direct link to their position: http://www.nationalmssociety.org/docs/HOM/nmss_stemcell_statement.pdf.
So, this new study is stellar news. But, I don’t think we should jump the gun either. Even one of the study’s researchers has indicated it’s not necessarily the be all and end all — just yet. For example, another author, when writing about this recent research quoted Thomson (one of the two scientists in this study) when Thomson wrote in the Washington Post: “[It] changes both everything and nothing at all.” The author’s article (link below) continued with… “His and Yamanaka’s work is still in its early stages, and it’s unclear whether reprogrammed skin cells will turn out to be as useful as embryonic stem cells; for now, stem-cell experts agree that embryonic research must continue.”
Your link here worked, but it takes us to an Op/Ed defending Bush’s veto decision. I’m eager to read about the research itself.
Here are a couple of related stories, so we can all begin to educate ourselves on what seems to be very exciting news. And, I promise due dilligence to explore further reading on the option of adult vs. embryonic cells.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/11/science/11prof.html?ex=1355029200&en=46961d4d95e25073&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
http://socalpundit.com/blog/index.php/2007/12/12/medical-breakthrough-2/
If this is “THE” solution, I’m all for it. And, I truly hope it is the #1 medical breakthrough of 2007.
Thanks again for reading and taking the time to comment (without attacking, lol),
Kim
Well..here I go again~!..I’m sure I’m gonna catch hell for this posting but..Honey…I gotta “go there”! First off..if I offend anyone reading this…GET OVER IT! I wasn’t put on this earth to make anyone feel warm and fuzzy. (at least anyone I don’t want to make feel warm and fuzzy) I believe that if we can cure illness by any means other than harming other truly living beings…then we should pursue those options whole heartedly !I believe nothing is alive until it’s born. Call me crazy but if it’s not alive…IT’S NOT ALIVE!!!!! I eat eggs every morning for breakfast. Are you now going to tell me I’ve been eating chicken all along? Whatever. As you can probably tell…I don’t always travel the “PC” highway. Frankly..if I don’t personally know you…I really couldn’t care less about your opinions or beliefs. We all have them…and get this…they’re ALL right! That’s right…we are ALL right! It’s just a matter of perspective.So..if there is something out there that can cure disease…why are we hesitating?
So, I talked to my mom today. No, she and my dad don’t believe in embryonic stem cell research — for a variety of reasons, but I’m relieved they still believe in me. And, yes, my 12 years of Catholic upbringing, while I might not agree with everything related to the Catholic church, DID give me my morals and values and made me the person I am today. I’m grateful for that.
As we talked, I realized that my parents’ Federal tax dollars shouldn’t go towards stem cell research because they don’t believe in it. I’d imagine that if the government decided that it was necessary to do radical experimentation on all living redheads and our tax dollars would fund it — well, I’d have a significant problem with that and would likely end up in jail for tax evasion.
Let’s get creative though. Yes, I can donate to private funds for this type of experimentation. But, if I have to pay federal taxes, give me some options as to where that money goes. Give me the option to put some of MY tax dollars (not yours) towards this research.
And, I’ll make a deal with everyone. Publicly. Show me proven facts, proven research, proven results that there is another cure for killer diseases. Give me another solution and I’ll walk away from embryonic research tomorrow.
December 13, 2007 at 10:39 am8
From Dad and Mom
Surprise! Our child thought that her parents would be upset with her political and religious views. Sorry to disappoint everyone. We know our daughter who has grown into a loving, caring human being not just for family and friends but for the entire community and those on the web. Do we agree with all your philosophies? No, but we respect your honesty and intelligence in thinking through their development.
Your education both religious and secular have prepared you to face life’s challenges with an open mind and the ability, we hope, to see anyone elses philosophies and be able to change or remain steadfast. The medical and political worlds have to somehow blend with the religious world. We hope that individuals such as yourself will lead the way to conquer this MONSTER as well as other afflictions.
Each life has a journey and a road with bumps—some big and some little. You have hit some big ones and they have not defeated you because you have the ability to spring back and fight and move forward. (Just like Sampson only we don’t believe his hair was red. Tee Hee) GO GIRL
Far be it from me to go against my father and stepmother, but all options need to be considered when dealing with something as controversial as this. I’m not saying that stem cell research is bad, however I am saying that if there are other options, they should be explored. (And yes, there is a point that if you crack open an egg, it will be a little chick inside, whether its fully developed and hatched or not…but that’s another topic.) I agree with the purpose of stem cell research. If there are people who are alive and kicking that can be cured by this research, I say go for it! But keep in mind, there are alternatives to the stem cells, or at least how the stem cells are obtained. As it turns out, the Umbilical Cord Blood (usually a part of medical waste after childbirth) has promising research as well, to provide similar results as the stem cells. The difference is, there is no risk to anyone, alive or unborn in how it is obtained. Therefore, less controversial, and everyone wins!
http://www.corcell.com/about/press_03_15_04.html
There is some promising new research soon to begin — using umbilical cords and placental stem cells. Yes, it’s a fantastic option, TOO. Scientists are preparing for a large clinical trial in 2008 which aims to use stem cells to help 400 patients with spinal cord injuries in Hong Kong, mainland China and Taiwan grow new cells and nerve fibers.
Stem cells from umbilical cord blood will be injected into the spinal cords of the participants, who will also be given lithium to help stimulate cell regeneration.
It’s thought that if this can help those with spinal cord injuries, it might also help M.S. patients. We’re also dealing with nerve fibers and spinal cord issues.
Now, my daughter, has anyone told you that you are brilliant, highly educated, and apparently very well informed? Ok, so you’re opinionated (LOL) — you get that from your dad! Maybe you could help teach him how to navigate the PC Highway a little more.
Well, I don’t believe that my federal tax dollars should be spent funding a war in Iraq either, but I don’t have that option.
If we can eradicate horrible diseases through stem cell research, then we should do it. The people who claim that the federal government shouldn’t pay for research that could potentially save lives are the same people who support a war that is killing thousands.
Ok, I’ll get off my soapbox now.
FYI: Kim, Did you know that Mitt Romney’s wife has MS?
No, I didn’t! Thanks for telling me, I’ll read up on her.