Where Does Your Monster Live?
April 29, 2008 by kfabrizio
Maybe your monster lives in the closet, like the one my new buddy Trevis writes about. Maybe he lives at the end of the book, like mine does. Today’s monster is Mighty Relapse, and you won’t find him hanging out with the other monsters on Sesame Street. M.R., for short, is too ugly to live with cuties like Elmo and Zoe. Regardless of where your monster lives, or how ugly he is, take my advice – it’s better to meet the monster head on and deal with him. Remember, my friends, Knowledge Decreases Fear.
It’s only been nineteen days since my IPIR and allergy attack from Copaxone. For fifteen days now I’ve been pondering if I’m in a true M.S. relapse. Yesterday (ironically on my five month anniversary of my M.S. diagnosis) I came to the realization that (duh, yes), I’ve been in a full blown relapse. My symptoms are much, much worse and very obvious. And, they’ve been driving me nuts for many days now. I wanted to blame everything on the Copaxone reaction, when in my heart I knew this was a true relapse. Why? Because I hoped to get through a full year without a relapse occurring.
I also hoped to make it through a full year without any new lesions coming out to play. We’re beginning to think I didn’t beat the odds on that spectrum either. (The hubby isn’t taking me to Vegas anytime soon). My foot buzzing/vibration symptom is a new one since my last MRI – and possibly could mean a new lesion has appeared. An MRI is in my near future and we’ll sort it all out then.
In the meantime, the Copaxone is definitely out. The reaction was too much like an allergic one (very rare apparently for folks on Copaxone) and it’s not something to mess around with. So, yesterday, the hubby and I played in the Alphabet Soup with my awesome neurologist and together we reached a conclusion. We’re going with Rebif (at least for now). I’m nervous about the flu symptom side effects, the possible liver issues, and the building up of anti-bodies, but we all need to be nervous about something don’t we?
The hubby and I considered Tysabri as well, and if the Rebif isn’t manageable, that’s where we’re headed next. I was drowning in my soup, so when push came to shove, I told the hubby to make the decision for me. Even though the you-know-what guessed my weight at 22 pounds higher than what it is, he does have a solid decision-making ability. He decided at this point in the game to err on the side of caution, selecting the more established treatment method, the one with a longer history than just a couple of years. Plus, who knows how bad those flu symptoms will be for me anyway. Avoiding a monster doesn’t create knowledge and we all know that it’s really knowledge that decreases fear. I won’t know until I try it. If nothing else, I know the Tysabri option may still be available to me as well.
Here’s why I’m torn. Tysabri really seems to be a strong drug – strong meaning that it’s apparently quickly effective for the treatment of MS, perhaps even stronger than Rebif. But there is a level of risk with a newer, less tested treatment. Does it really work? Yes, people died while on it – but they were on Avonex at the same time. Can a couple of years tell us enough about a drug that is infused into our body once a month? Risk vs. reward. We decided on the lower risk option for right now.
In the meantime, while I wait for my new MRI, my next round of blood work that will serve as my baseline for testing liver function and antibodies, and for my shipment of Rebif to arrive, I’m going to be doing some reading. Have you heard about Campath? I also have the opportunity to enter into a clinical trial – Rebif vs. Campath – a new infusion medication that is done only once a year! This experimental drug is for treating M.S., organ transplant rejection, and several types of leukemia. The generic name for Campath is Alemtuzumab. I wanted to be involved in a clinical trial since my diagnosis. If I have to have this disease, the least I can do is help others in the process through scientific research. If I enter this clinical trial, designed to compare Campath to Rebif, I’d end up taking one or the other for a period of time (two years). Before I commit to such a study, I want to do two things (a) see if I can tolerate Rebif in case I get selected for that treatment group and (b) read up on Campath itself. With a relapse and possible new lesion(s) within only five months of diagnosis, I want to be sure what I’m doing. I don’t want my brain and nervous system to suffer at the hands of science either.
Interesting info on Tysabri:
______________________________________________
Biogen says no new brain infections with Tysabri
Thursday, Apr. 17, 2008; 4:28 AM
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Biogen Idec and its partner Elan Corp said on Tuesday no new cases of a potentially deadly brain infection have been seen among patients taking their Tysabri multiple sclerosis drug since it was re-introduced in July 2006.
The companies said no cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, or PML, were seen by the end of March among about 26,000 patients taking the drug.
Given the favorable safety findings, the companies said they were moving towards their goal of having 100,000 patients on the medicine by the end of 2010.
Tysabri, which has been shown highly effective in treating the progressive neurological disease, was temporarily suspended from the market in 2005 after several patients developed PML. But it was allowed back in 2006 — with certain restrictions — after U.S. regulators decided MS patients were willing to accept the risks in return for the potential benefits.
The new safety data were presented on Tuesday at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology in Chicago.
Sounds very interesting. I’m sure you’ll do all the research you need to do to make an informed decision about your treatment.
Kim,
I was thinking of you today driving to work. A car headed towards me had a cookie monster toy attached to the front grill and I giggled, thinking, what a great metaphor Kim would make of that. Put the MS up front ready to take on the world.
S.
Shauna, I wonder if there was (injury-less) car accident where the one with Cookie slammed into the back of another, if there would be nothing but crumbs left at the scene??? I like your idea — putting MS up front!
Kim: I have been on Tysabri since January, 2007 and my last MRI showed no new lesions, so I was thrilled. I started with
Avonex, then Betaseron, Novatrone (only 5 treatments) and Rebif and this is by far the best option for me. I was diagnosed in 1991, when there weren’t any treatments. Hopefully we will have a pill soon! So don’t let the monster scare you–there are so many new things on the horizon. We all just have to keep trying to find what works best for each of us. Good luck!
Hi Kim,
My name is Lauren and I have had 20 infusions of Tysabri since October 2006, with my 21st infusion scheduled in two weeks. I have not had a relapse nor any disease progression since that time (17.5 months). I have friends that were in the Tysabri trials that are still on Tysabri, and they have had over 61 infusions so far. I testified (via videotape) before the FDA AC in March 2006 along with other MS patients in an effort to bring Tysabri back to the market for those of us who not only want it, but needed it badly. Thank God it is now available for us as it is a 67% superior MS medication in preventing further relapses, they’re accumulating disabilities, and slowing the disease process whereas the ABCRs have only efficacy between 34% and 29%, respectively. (not to mention thei horrible side effects which are well documented).
You stated, “Remember, my friends, Knowledge Decreases Fear”… Knowledge Is Power, and your fear of Tysabri is understandable, but completely unfounded.
You also stated, “Tysabri really seems to be a strong drug – strong meaning that it’s apparently quickly effective for the treatment of MS, perhaps even stronger than Rebif. But there is a level of risk with a newer, less tested treatment”.
Tysabri does not destroy any cells, it only prevents a majority of T cells from crossing the Blood Brain Barrier and entering the CNS where they cause damage and eventual axonal loss. Tysabri gives your body a chance to heal itself from the damage caused by prior relapses, providing the damage is not permanent.
The two trial patients that developed PML and died did NOT have MS, and both were severely immune compromised. (sorry for the caps, but I do not know how to bold my type through Word press).
The New England Journal of Medicine authors have studied all data regarding Tysabri, and have reached the expert opinion that PML is caused by a diminished immunosurveillance [not Tysabri]. See:
http://tinyurl.com/2mhn82
The level of risk to you refer to is 0.1% (which is minimal)… your odds of getting hit by a moving bus and dying are greater than ever developing PML if you are not immune suppressed. The Touch protocol prohibits MS patients that are severely immune suppressed from receiving Tysabri, so there is a safeguard in place. Furthermore, there are over 26,000 MS patients currently on Tysabri, and none of us have developed PML… Tysabri has been in human trials since 1999, with the Affirm trials for Tysabri as a monotherapy still ongoing since 2003.
If your comfort zone compels you to try Rebif first with its lesser efficacy by more than half compared to Tysabri, I wish you nothing but the very best, and I hope and pray that Rebif works for you because I believe our choice of MS therapy is a very personal one, and I’m not trying to talk you into Tysabri therapy. I am only giving you accurate facts to help allay your fears, actual experiences, and information for you to make an informed decision (I too am a Patient Advocate for my own health, and this is where Knowledge Becomes Power).
FYI, Campath has been known to cause Graves’ disease, and also, in the Campath trials, you would be surprised that in 2005, the trials were stopped when three MS patients develop a blood disorder, and one of them died. This is because Campath destroys not only the damaging T cells, but B cells as well, and their bodies were not able to fight off infections nor have their blood clot when needed. You can read more about this at the following link:
http://tinyurl.com/3t76bo
Nevertheless dearheart, I send you many supportive hugs no matter which DMD choose… all my best -
Lauren
Hi Lauren — welcome to the Sunshine. Wow, you sure do present a compelling case for Tysabri. I had such a tough decision and I’m already second-guessing it. I would so much prefer the Tysabri regimen for my lifestyle and b/c of not having the nasty side effects. More importantly I’m enthralled with what I’ve been reading online and from commenters like you about its results. (This is why I looked to the hubby to help me decide the other day).
Thanks, too, for the Campath info. I’m making sure my friend sees this as well — she’s considering the trial, too.
I still haven’t confirmed my Rebif prescription — not my decision is up in the air again.
I have had my second dose of Tysabri and all is going well. Ironically, the first week after the infusion, I am more tired but my spastic clonic left leg loosens up quite a bit which is one of those “Wow, something is working!” moments.
Good luck to you.
I found your blog while scouring the net for people’s experiences after Campath. I received a 5 day dose 3/17/08.
Waiting for the miracle now….Battling pneumonia and general malaise though there are a few really good days probably attributed to less swelling in my brain.
If you decide to join the campath study, please consider documenting your experiences for all us guinea pigs out here! There are a few diaries but little reported beyond 6 months…that I’ve found. Best of luck.
Thanks, Kristin, for sharing. Is the pneumonia a result of the Campath? I’m going with Tysabri for now, but a friend of mine might be going with Campath….